GEOSPATIAL FRONTIERS
A Publication by Project Geospatial
LOOKING BEYOND
THE MAP
Geospatial Frontiers, a new publication from Project Geospatial, brings together leading voices and experts from across the geospatial ecosystem to tackle the industry's most pressing challenges. Through in-depth articles and discussions, Geospatial Frontiers aims to explore innovative solutions and spark critical conversations that will shape the future of geospatial technology and its applications.
Contributing Authors
Integrating Commercial and Government Software for GEOINT Superiority: A Strategic Framework for Congress and Senior DoW/IC Leaders
The GOTS Dilemma: Is the DoW Finally Ready for a Commercial-First Reality? Read Keith Barber's unfiltered white paper on the systemic failures of government software acquisition (GOTS) and the urgent need for the Department of War (DoW) to embrace a commercial-first (COTS) strategy. Barber argues that duplicating commercial tech is a strategic risk, hindering lethality and speed in the geospatial intelligence ecosystem. Dive into the full analysis and our exclusive "So What" breakdown to understand how Secretary Hegseth's new directives could reshape the future of GEOINT and defense contracting below.
The New Battlespace: How Geospatial AI, Outdated Intelligence, and the Illusion of Oversight Are Reshaping Military Targeting
In this critical analysis of the new algorithmic battlespace, we explore how Geospatial AI and scaling failures are driving catastrophic military targeting errors. Prompted by the tragic civilian strike in Minab, Iran, this article dissects the fatal intersection of Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) database rot, the outdated Modernized Integrated Database (MIDB), and automated kill chains. Discover how the military's aggressive push for AI target generation has fundamentally broken the "human-in-the-loop" safeguard, reducing traditional intelligence vetting to an illusion of oversight. By examining the psychological toll of cognitive offloading and automated bureaucracy, we reveal why overwhelming human analysts with algorithmic output doesn't just risk mass civilian casualties and fratricide, it weaponizes administrative failure.